Official EPA Records
City of Andrews
Official EPA contamination & sampling records · Texas, TX
What official records show
Health violations
126
All 126 resolved · Most recent: January 2024
PFAS detected (UCMR 5)
None
58 monitoring samples — no detections above MRL
Above MCL level (monitoring)
None
No PFAS above EPA MCL thresholds in monitoring data
EPA compliance records for City of Andrews (PWSID: TX0020001) in Texas, TX show 126 health-based violations recorded in EPA SDWIS, all resolved and no PFAS detections above the minimum reporting level in EPA UCMR 5 monitoring. All records on this page are sourced from EPA SDWIS and the UCMR 5 dataset. This is official monitoring data — not a health risk determination.
Health-Based Violation History
Source: EPA SDWIS (Safe Drinking Water Information System). A health-based violation means a contaminant exceeded the legal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) or a required treatment technique was not met during the violation period. Resolved violations indicate the utility returned to compliance.
| Contaminant | Violation date |
|---|---|
Total Coliform | Jan 2024 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2023 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2023 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2023 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2023 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2022 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2022 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2022 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2019 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2019 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2019 |
Unspecified | Jan 2019 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2019 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2018 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2018 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2016 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2016 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2016 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2016 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2016 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2016 |
Unspecified | Oct 2015 |
Unspecified | Oct 2015 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2015 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2015 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2015 |
Unspecified | Jul 2015 |
Unspecified | Jul 2015 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2015 |
Unspecified | Apr 2015 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2015 |
Unspecified | Apr 2015 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2015 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2015 |
Unspecified | Jan 2015 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2015 |
Unspecified | Jan 2015 |
Unspecified | Oct 2014 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2014 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2014 |
Unspecified | Oct 2014 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2014 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2014 |
Unspecified | Jul 2014 |
Unspecified | Jul 2014 |
Unspecified | Apr 2014 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2014 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2014 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2014 |
Unspecified | Jan 2014 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2014 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2013 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2013 |
Unspecified | Oct 2013 |
Unspecified | Jul 2013 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2013 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2013 |
Unspecified | Apr 2013 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2013 |
Unspecified | Jan 2013 |
Unspecified | Oct 2012 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2012 |
Unspecified | Jul 2012 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2012 |
Unspecified | Apr 2012 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2012 |
Unspecified | Jan 2012 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2012 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2011 |
Unspecified | Oct 2011 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2011 |
Unspecified | Jul 2011 |
Unspecified | Apr 2011 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2011 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2011 |
Unspecified | Jan 2011 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2010 |
Unspecified | Oct 2010 |
Unspecified | Jul 2010 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2010 |
Unspecified | Apr 2010 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2010 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2010 |
Unspecified | Jan 2010 |
Unspecified | Oct 2009 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2009 |
Unspecified | Jul 2009 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2009 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2009 |
Unspecified | Apr 2009 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2009 |
Unspecified | Jan 2009 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2008 |
Unspecified | Oct 2008 |
Unspecified | Jul 2008 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2008 |
Unspecified | Apr 2008 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2008 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2008 |
Unspecified | Oct 2007 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2007 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2007 |
Unspecified | Jul 2007 |
Unspecified | Apr 2007 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2007 |
Total Coliform | Jan 2007 |
Unspecified | Jan 2007 |
Total Coliform | Oct 2006 |
Unspecified | Oct 2006 |
Total Coliform | Jul 2006 |
Unspecified | Jul 2006 |
Total Coliform | Apr 2006 |
Unspecified | Apr 2006 |
Unspecified | Jan 2006 |
Unspecified | Jul 2005 |
Unspecified | Apr 2005 |
Unspecified | Jan 2005 |
Unspecified | Oct 2004 |
Unspecified | Jul 2004 |
Unspecified | Apr 2004 |
Unspecified | Jan 2004 |
Unspecified | Oct 2003 |
Unspecified | Jul 2003 |
Unspecified | Jan 2003 |
Unspecified | Jan 2002 |
Unspecified | Jan 1999 |
Showing 126 health-based violations. View full violation history on EPA ECHO ↗
Official Water Sampling Events (EPA UCMR 5)
EPA UCMR 5 monitoring conducted 2 sampling events at City of Andrews. Each event tests water drawn from a designated sampling point for PFAS compounds. Source: EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 5, 2023–2025.
| Sample date | Compounds tested |
|---|---|
| June 2025 | 29 |
| December 2024 | 29 |
Sampling events represent distinct official water sample records from EPA UCMR 5. Learn about UCMR 5 methodology ↗
PFAS Monitoring: No Detections Above MRL (EPA UCMR 5)
EPA UCMR 5 monitoring recorded 58 sampling results for City of Andrews. No PFAS compounds were detected above the minimum reporting level in any sample. This means measured concentrations — where present — were below the laboratory's minimum quantifiable threshold, not necessarily zero.
View full PFAS monitoring table →What this does not mean
- —Violations do not indicate current non-compliance. A health-based violation that is marked resolved means the utility has returned to compliance per EPA records. Historic violations are shown for transparency, not to imply ongoing risk.
- —PFAS detections above MRL are not themselves violations. UCMR 5 monitoring is a surveillance program. Detection does not mean the utility violated a regulation. The 2024 EPA PFAS rule (MCLs for PFOA, PFOS, etc.) has a compliance deadline of 2029.
- —This page does not assess health risk. WaterUtilityReport.com presents official government records — we do not make health risk determinations, safety certifications, or compliance judgments. Consult a licensed water quality specialist or physician for health advice.
- —Records may be incomplete. EPA SDWIS and UCMR 5 represent what was reported to the EPA. Not all utilities or contaminants are covered. Small systems (<10,000 people) may not have been required to participate in UCMR 5 monitoring.
Independent Verification
Get your water tested by a certified lab
EPA compliance data shows what utilities report to regulators. An independent test from a certified laboratory confirms what is actually coming out of your tap at the point of use. Labs in Texas can test for PFAS (EPA Method 533 or 537.1), lead, nitrates, bacteria, and more.
Official Records FAQs
Official Data Sources
EPA SDWIS — Compliance & Violations
EPA ECHO: City of Andrews Detailed Facility ReportEPA UCMR 5 — PFAS Monitoring Data
EPA UCMR 5 Program OverviewEPA PFAS Rule (April 2024)
EPA PFAS in Drinking Water RuleRelated pages
Public drinking water datasets may not include every recent test, private well result, household plumbing issue, or local advisory. Use this page as a starting point, not as a substitute for official guidance, your utility's Consumer Confidence Report, or professional testing.
Water Utility Report summarizes public records from official federal, state, utility, or testing datasets where available. For urgent health or compliance questions, contact your utility, local health department, or the EPA directly. How Water Utility Report uses public drinking water data