Home/Compare/Utilities
Back to Compare

NORTH AURORA vs CHICAGO

Water quality comparison — risk levels, violations, PFAS records, and contaminants

Quick Answer

CHICAGO has a lower risk classification (safe). NORTH AURORA has 0 open health-based violations and 116 PFAS records. CHICAGO has 0 open health-based violations and 232 PFAS records.

NORTH AURORA

Illinois · IL0890600

Overall Risk Level

Low Concern

No Concern
Low
Moderate
High
Critical

Minor detections below regulatory limits. Routine monitoring adequate.

0

Open violations

116

PFAS records

CHICAGO

Illinois · IL0316000

Overall Risk Level

No Concerns Detected

No Concern
Low
Moderate
High
Critical

Water meets all safety standards with no detected exceedances.

0

Open violations

232

PFAS records

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricNORTH AURORACHICAGO
StateIllinoisIllinois
Risk LevelLow ConcernNo Concerns Detected
Population Served18,2612,746,388
Open Health Violations00
Total Violations750
PFAS Records116232
OwnershipLocalLocal
Service TypeGroundwaterSurface water
City ServedNorth AuroraChicago

Contaminants in Violation Records

NORTH AURORA

No named contaminants in violation records.

CHICAGO

  • Lead
  • Nitrate
  • Turbidity

Key Differences

NORTH AURORA has a low risk rating vs. safe for CHICAGO.

NORTH AURORA has 116 PFAS records vs. 232 for CHICAGO.

What Should I Do?

If either utility shows open violations or elevated PFAS records, consider:

  • Installing a reverse osmosis filter — removes PFAS, lead, arsenic, nitrates, and most heavy metals.
  • Requesting your utility’s annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) for the most current test results.
  • Ordering a certified lab water test if you want contaminant-specific data for your address.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer — NORTH AURORA or CHICAGO?

CHICAGO has a lower risk classification (safe). CHICAGO has 0 open health-based violations compared to 0 for the other system.

What does "open health-based violation" mean?

An open health-based violation means a water system has exceeded an EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) or failed to meet a treatment technique — and the violation has not yet been resolved. These are the most serious type of water quality violations.

How current is this data?

Violation data comes from EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), which is updated as utilities report. PFAS data comes from EPA's UCMR 5 monitoring (2023–2025). Risk levels are recalculated daily.

What does PWSID mean?

PWSID stands for Public Water System ID — a unique federal identifier assigned to each community water system. You can use it to look up a system in EPA's ECHO database.

Related Pages